Does an UN Ambassador's relative have to be killed...

....before the US malAdministration decides to investigate the indiscriminate killing by US forces, spies, CIA operatives, Negroponte death squads, in Iraq, Afghanistan and other places around the world?

In a BBC report Saturday, 2 July, 2005, 06:36 GMT 07:36 UK "Iraq envoy accuses US of killing", Iraq's ambassador to the UN has demanded an inquiry into what he said was the "cold-blooded murder" of his young unarmed relative by US marines.

The news report went on to say:

"Mr Sumaidaie said the ramifications of such a "serious crime" were enormous for both the US and Iraq.

US officials said the allegations would be thoroughly investigated....

.....When asked if there were any weapons in the house, Mohammed took the marines to a room where there was a rifle with no live ammunition.

It was the last the family saw him alive. Shortly after, another brother was dragged out and beaten and the family was ordered to wait outside.

As the marines left "smiling at each other" an hour later, the interpreter told the mother they had killed Mohammed, said Mr Sumaidaie.

"In the bedroom, Mohammed was found dead and laying in a clotted pool of his blood. A single bullet had penetrated his neck."

The majority of US forces appear to be just blood-lusting animals.

So I do not subscribe to the general rally cry in the US - "support our troops".

Who in the world would support the actions of wild animals such as these. Only other wild animals!!

These people need to be tried by an International Court and harshly punished for their misdeeds.